The Scottish Parliament, 1639-1661
- ISBN
- 0859764125
The Scottish Parliament, 1639-1661 est un history, political science book de Young, John R..
À propos de ce livre
"The Scottish Parliament has long remained a neglected area of Scottish history, and this text can certainly lay claim to be the most extensively researched monograph on the subject since the publication of R.S. Rait's The Parliaments of Scotland in 1924." "The material is drawn from a wide spectrum of Scottish parliamentary sources, particularly from manuscript parliamentary committee registers, and data have been analysed from the printed Acts of the Parliament of Scotland. Development is charted within the wider context of the Covenanting Movement, Cromwellian Occupation, and the Restoration Settlement, and the central themes are (1) how the Scottish Covenanting Movement used the institution of Parliament in its struggle against Charles I, and (2) how the Scottish Parliament itself developed as a political and constitutional forum."--Jacket.
À propos de l'auteur
est l'auteur de The Scottish Parliament, 1639-1661. Parcourez son catalogue complet sur Booklogr.
Explorez plus de livres de Young, John R. →Éditions et Formats
Critiques
Pas encore de critiques. Avez-vous lu ce livre ? Partagez vos impressions avec la communauté Booklogr.
Se connecter Connectez-vous pour écrire une critique
Questions Fréquentes
Quel est le genre de The Scottish Parliament, 1639-1661 ?+
The Scottish Parliament, 1639-1661 est un livre de History, Political Science, Scotland, Scotland. Parliament, Scotland, politics and government.
De quoi parle The Scottish Parliament, 1639-1661 ?+
"The Scottish Parliament has long remained a neglected area of Scottish history, and this text can certainly lay claim to be the most extensively researched monograph on the subject since the publication of R.S. Rait's The Parliaments of Scotland in 1924." "The material is drawn from a wide spectrum...
Qui a écrit The Scottish Parliament, 1639-1661 ?+
The Scottish Parliament, 1639-1661 a été écrit par Young, John R..